RAGE I have 70 hours, and counting (slowly admittedly), and i'll be leaping on DLC as soon as it arrives. I personally racked up 44 hours on Skyrim, and have lost interest, I won't be buying DLC, as there are plenty of mods and story i ahven't explored yet.
Skyrim requires more time to get things done (in quite a few sections you'd be lucky to meet more than a handfull of enemies in 10 minutes), however people seem to get much more attatched to the story line. It's a game you can jump into, shoot the baddies for 10 minutes and move on from your break. I think that RAGe would have been more wide ranging in it's audience (if it had of launched well, adnt he requirements weren't so high), as there are a lot of things that you cna do in the game, from the minigames, to the racing to the FPS sections. If you don't like RPG's, then you aren't going to get into it. I believe that Skyrim is more for a select audience not a small audience, but a more specialised audience. Max Van Morrison Posts: 3503 Joined: Sat 4:48 pm Skyrim: named GOTY by every reviewer and their dog. Skyrim: patch 1.5 adds some new features. RAGE: a patch comes out that makes game playable on the other half of video cards. So does the unexpected High-Def texture pack.
Skyrim: patches come out regularly, ironing out bugs. Texture pack is canceled apparently the textures weight more, than the Library of Congress HD scans. PC textures aren't any better than on consoles (texture pack is promised) Level editor, announced 1 year before the release is not included. Unplayable on half the video cards in existence. RAGE: released October 4th - October 7th (depends on where you live). Let's compare them and their eventual fates, because why the hell not?
0 kommentar(er)
